|
||||
|
Frequently Asked Questions What will be done with the brief
descriptions? Some committee members will read
the brief descriptions.
One should expect that the brief descriptions will be read by more reviewers than the full extended abstracts. Brief descriptions will be sent to sub-referees, and will be used to help assign sub-referees. First of all, the brief
description should be self-contained, so that a committee member or
sub-reviewer can get some understanding of the paper from reading the
brief description alone.
In many cases, the brief
description will contain a simplified statement of the main result and
an outline of the proof (stressing the main ideas). The existence of
the extended abstract frees up the authors to write these 2 pages
informally, sketching their mental picture of the result. The
brief description is not expected to meet the standards of an academic
publication.
For an example of how informality can be useful, consider lecture notes. Or, read Umesh Vazirani's explanation of the benefits of one brief description. Is the brief description
really due the week after the extended abstract? Yes. Why? To give
authors time to reflect and relax after writing their extended
abstract. And to decrease the burden. Can I include a title page
with the list of authors and abstract, and not count it towards the 10
page limit? Yes. Traditionally a title
page does not count against the 10-page limit in FOCS submissions.
How should I indicate that my
paper is eligible for the Machtey award?
If the authors of your paper are
all students at the time of submission, it is eligible for the Machtey
award. Please inform the program chair by email to spielman@cs.yale.edu.
|
||||